510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Recalled · Class II · 2020

Mevatron, M 2 Class

K882729510(k) TraditionalCleared Sep 19, 198875-day reviewClass II21 CFR 892.5050Recalls 38

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Siemens Medical Laboratories, Inc. · IYE Accelerator, Linear, Medical

Cleared on Sep 19, 1988 after a 75-day review. FDA has not posted a summary or statement for it, so its predicates are not known. 39 later devices descend from it. It has been recalled 38 times.

Decided
Sep 19, 1988
Review
75 days
Class
Class II
Product code
IYE
Recalls
38
Predicates
0

39 later devices descend from it, 3 citing it directly.

Descendants, by year cleared 1998: 2 descendants cleared1999: 1 descendant cleared2002: 2 descendants cleared2006: 3 descendants cleared2003: 2 descendants cleared2009: 4 descendants cleared2005: 1 descendant cleared2012: 2 descendants cleared2010: 2 descendants cleared2007: 1 descendant cleared2013: 1 descendant cleared2011: 3 descendants cleared2004: 1 descendant cleared2014: 2 descendants cleared2018: 2 descendants cleared2008: 1 descendant cleared2016: 2 descendants cleared2015: 1 descendant cleared2020: 2 descendants cleared2017: 2 descendants cleared2021: 1 descendant cleared2023: 1 descendant cleared1990200020102020
  1. This deviceK882729 Mevatron, M 2 ClassSiemens Medical Laboratories, Inc. · 1988
  2. Descendant · cites it directly · 28 of its ownK982502 Genesis Imrt Linear AcceleratorSiemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc. · 1998 · Recalled
  3. Descendant · 2 generations on · 27 of its ownK013673 HI-Art SystemTomo Therapy, Inc. · 2002
  4. Descendant · 3 generations on · 26 of its ownK033347 Modification to: HI-Art SystemTomotherapy Incorporated · 2003
  5. Descendant · 4 generations on · 25 of its ownK042739 HI-Art SystemTomotherapy Incorporated · 2004
  6. Descendant · 5 generations on · 24 of its ownK060912 Modification to: HI-Art SystemTomotherapy Incorporated · 2006 · Recalled

Showing 5 of 39 descendants. See all descendants

Descendants cleared per year

1998: 21999: 12002: 22003: 22004: 12005: 12006: 32007: 12008: 12009: 42010: 22011: 32012: 22013: 12014: 22015: 12016: 22017: 22018: 22020: 22021: 12023: 1
1998high 4 (2009) · low 0 (2000)2026

Most influential descendants

Showing 5 of 39 · See all
  • K982502Genesis Imrt Linear AcceleratorSiemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc. · 1998 · cites it directly28descendants
  • K013673HI-Art SystemTomo Therapy, Inc. · 2002 · 2 generations on27descendants
  • K033347Modification to: HI-Art SystemTomotherapy Incorporated · 2003 · 3 generations on26descendants
  • K042739HI-Art SystemTomotherapy Incorporated · 2004 · 4 generations on25descendants
  • K060912Modification to: HI-Art SystemTomotherapy Incorporated · 2006 · 5 generations on24descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
0 (this device)K882729Mevatron, M 2 ClassSiemens Medical Laboratories, Inc.1988—
+1K982502Genesis Imrt Linear AcceleratorSiemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc.19984
+2K013673HI-Art SystemTomo Therapy, Inc.2002—
+3K033347Modification to: HI-Art SystemTomotherapy Incorporated2003—
+4K042739HI-Art SystemTomotherapy Incorporated2004—
+5K060912Modification to: HI-Art SystemTomotherapy Incorporated20064

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
199820
199910
200220
200320
200410
200510
200630
200710
200810
200940
201020
201130
201220
201310
201420
201510
201620
201720
201820
202020
202110
202310
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K882729, 1988–2023Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in IYE? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new IYE device

  1. #1 K252977 Halcyon, Ethos Radiotherapy System (5.0)score 18.8 · 18 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against?

FDA has not posted a summary or statement for it, so its predicates are not known.

What descends from it? (39)

See all 39

3 later devices cite it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K982502Genesis Imrt Linear AcceleratorSiemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc.199828
K993425PrimusSiemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc.199917
K982513MX MevatronSiemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc.19981

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

Recalls of this device

DateClassRecallRoot causeReason
Feb 18, 2020Class IIZ-1678-2020Use errorPotential safety issue with the dose monitoring system safety interlocks which could result in a 10-20% overdose of radiation therapy.
Feb 18, 2020Class IIZ-1679-2020Use errorPotential safety issue with the dose monitoring system safety interlocks which could result in a 10-20% overdose of radiation therapy.
Jan 25, 2017Class IIZ-1436-2017Under Investigation by firmSiemens became aware of a defective weld seam at overhead suspensions. Due to this defect it is possible for the weld seam to break and to cause the overhead suspension to fall down. This can lead to a severe injury to a patient or any…
Dec 1, 2011Not classifiedZ-0787-2012Nonconforming Material/ComponentBolts holding the trim weight may break causing the plates of the counterweight to become loose and fall into the cover.
Dec 1, 2011Not classifiedZ-0788-2012Nonconforming Material/ComponentBolts holding the trim weight may break causing the plates of the counterweight to become loose and fall into the cover.
Dec 1, 2011Not classifiedZ-0796-2012Nonconforming Material/ComponentBolts holding the trim weight may break causing the plates of the counterweight to become loose and fall into the cover.
Dec 1, 2011Not classifiedZ-0792-2012Nonconforming Material/ComponentBolts holding the trim weight may break causing the plates of the counterweight to become loose and fall into the cover.
Dec 1, 2011Not classifiedZ-0793-2012Nonconforming Material/ComponentBolts holding the trim weight may break causing the plates of the counterweight to become loose and fall into the cover.
Dec 1, 2011Not classifiedZ-0783-2012Nonconforming Material/ComponentBolts holding the trim weight may break causing the plates of the counterweight to become loose and fall into the cover.
Dec 1, 2011Not classifiedZ-0784-2012Nonconforming Material/ComponentBolts holding the trim weight may break causing the plates of the counterweight to become loose and fall into the cover.
Dec 1, 2011Not classifiedZ-0786-2012Nonconforming Material/ComponentBolts holding the trim weight may break causing the plates of the counterweight to become loose and fall into the cover.
Dec 1, 2011Not classifiedZ-0789-2012Nonconforming Material/ComponentBolts holding the trim weight may break causing the plates of the counterweight to become loose and fall into the cover.
Dec 1, 2011Not classifiedZ-0790-2012Nonconforming Material/ComponentBolts holding the trim weight may break causing the plates of the counterweight to become loose and fall into the cover.
Dec 1, 2011Not classifiedZ-0794-2012Nonconforming Material/ComponentBolts holding the trim weight may break causing the plates of the counterweight to become loose and fall into the cover.
Dec 1, 2011Not classifiedZ-0798-2012Nonconforming Material/ComponentBolts holding the trim weight may break causing the plates of the counterweight to become loose and fall into the cover.
Dec 1, 2011Not classifiedZ-0780-2012Nonconforming Material/ComponentBolts holding the trim weight may break causing the plates of the counterweight to become loose and fall into the cover.
Dec 1, 2011Not classifiedZ-0781-2012Nonconforming Material/ComponentBolts holding the trim weight may break causing the plates of the counterweight to become loose and fall into the cover.
Dec 1, 2011Not classifiedZ-0785-2012Nonconforming Material/ComponentBolts holding the trim weight may break causing the plates of the counterweight to become loose and fall into the cover.
Dec 1, 2011Not classifiedZ-0791-2012Nonconforming Material/ComponentBolts holding the trim weight may break causing the plates of the counterweight to become loose and fall into the cover.
Dec 1, 2011Not classifiedZ-0795-2012Nonconforming Material/ComponentBolts holding the trim weight may break causing the plates of the counterweight to become loose and fall into the cover.
Dec 1, 2011Not classifiedZ-0797-2012Nonconforming Material/ComponentBolts holding the trim weight may break causing the plates of the counterweight to become loose and fall into the cover.
Jan 11, 2008Not classifiedZ-1402-2008Software designLinear accelerator gantry may rotate in an unexpected direction and may cause patient injury on impact.
Jan 11, 2008Not classifiedZ-1401-2008Software designLinear accelerator gantry may rotate in an unexpected direction and may cause patient injury on impact.
Aug 7, 2007Not classifiedZ-0683-2008Device DesignIncorrect field size -- Products manufactured prior to 1999 may experience jaw field size errors during interlock resulting in potential mistreatment if a light field check is not performed. This problem is present in machines with serial…
Aug 7, 2007Not classifiedZ-0678-2008Device DesignIncorrect field size -- Products manufactured prior to 1999 may experience jaw field size errors during interlock resulting in potential mistreatment if a light field check is not performed. This problem is present in machines with serial…
Aug 7, 2007Not classifiedZ-0679-2008Device DesignIncorrect field size -- Products manufactured prior to 1999 may experience jaw field size errors during interlock resulting in potential mistreatment if a light field check is not performed. This problem is present in machines with serial…
Aug 7, 2007Not classifiedZ-0682-2008Device DesignIncorrect field size -- Products manufactured prior to 1999 may experience jaw field size errors during interlock resulting in potential mistreatment if a light field check is not performed. This problem is present in machines with serial…
Aug 7, 2007Not classifiedZ-0684-2008Device DesignIncorrect field size -- Products manufactured prior to 1999 may experience jaw field size errors during interlock resulting in potential mistreatment if a light field check is not performed. This problem is present in machines with serial…
Jul 27, 2007Not classifiedZ-0852-2008Component design/selectionDoor Hinge failures; loose or falling off (Stationary Structure Doors)
Mar 22, 2007Not classifiedZ-0156-2008Software designMistreatment of radiation therapy due to inadvertent parameter changes or miss-calibration in Service Mode. The miss-calibration can affect the beam profile and Virtual Wedge angle. This leads to patient mistreatment and alteration of…
Mar 22, 2007Not classifiedZ-0162-2008Software designMistreatment of radiation therapy due to inadvertent parameter changes or miss-calibration in Service Mode. The miss-calibration can affect the beam profile and Virtual Wedge angle. This leads to patient mistreatment and alteration of…
Mar 22, 2007Not classifiedZ-0163-2008Software designMistreatment of radiation therapy due to inadvertent parameter changes or miss-calibration in Service Mode. The miss-calibration can affect the beam profile and Virtual Wedge angle. This leads to patient mistreatment and alteration of…
Mar 22, 2007Not classifiedZ-0155-2008Software designMistreatment of radiation therapy due to inadvertent parameter changes or miss-calibration in Service Mode. The miss-calibration can affect the beam profile and Virtual Wedge angle. This leads to patient mistreatment and alteration of…
Mar 22, 2007Not classifiedZ-0159-2008Software designMistreatment of radiation therapy due to inadvertent parameter changes or miss-calibration in Service Mode. The miss-calibration can affect the beam profile and Virtual Wedge angle. This leads to patient mistreatment and alteration of…
Mar 22, 2007Not classifiedZ-0161-2008Software designMistreatment of radiation therapy due to inadvertent parameter changes or miss-calibration in Service Mode. The miss-calibration can affect the beam profile and Virtual Wedge angle. This leads to patient mistreatment and alteration of…
Mar 22, 2007Not classifiedZ-0157-2008Software designMistreatment of radiation therapy due to inadvertent parameter changes or miss-calibration in Service Mode. The miss-calibration can affect the beam profile and Virtual Wedge angle. This leads to patient mistreatment and alteration of…
Mar 22, 2007Not classifiedZ-0160-2008Software designMistreatment of radiation therapy due to inadvertent parameter changes or miss-calibration in Service Mode. The miss-calibration can affect the beam profile and Virtual Wedge angle. This leads to patient mistreatment and alteration of…
Mar 22, 2007Not classifiedZ-0158-2008Software designMistreatment of radiation therapy due to inadvertent parameter changes or miss-calibration in Service Mode. The miss-calibration can affect the beam profile and Virtual Wedge angle. This leads to patient mistreatment and alteration of…

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • Of its descendants, K982502 (Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc., 1998) has gone furthest, with 28 descendants of its own.

How does its category compare?

All IYE devices

IYE Accelerator, Linear, Medical: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · IYE

12in 2025

2007: 232008: 142009: 202010: 232011: 112012: 282013: 182014: 202015: 202016: 212017: 232018: 212019: 192020: 202021: 192022: 122023: 182024: 92025: 122026 (partial year): 14
2007high 28 (2012) · low 9 (2024)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · IYE

170in 2025

2007: 44 days median2008: 69 days median2009: 63 days median2010: 74 days median2011: 94 days median2012: 106 days median2013: 88 days median2014: 100 days median2015: 108 days median2016: 97 days median2017: 94 days median2018: 58 days median2019: 83 days median2020: 67 days median2021: 86 days median2022: 172 days median2023: 129 days median2024: 239 days median2025: 170 days median2026 (partial year): 120 days median
2007high 239 (2024) · low 44 (2007)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · IYE

1in 2025

2007: 782008: 492009: 222010: 272011: 732012: 202013: 112014: 142015: 82016: 72017: 72018: 72019: 22020: 42021: 52022: 32023: 72024: 12025: 12026 (partial year): 4
2007high 78 (2007) · low 1 (2024)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · IYE

101in 2025

2007: 1552008: 1142009: 1742010: 2462011: 2802012: 1282013: 962014: 1242015: 1002016: 972017: 1252018: 852019: 912020: 742021: 682022: 662023: 1282024: 812025: 101
2007high 280 (2011) · low 66 (2022)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code IYE, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
2007234478155
2008146949114
2009206322174
2010237427246
2011119473280
20122810620128
201318881196
20142010014124
2015201088100
20162197797
201723947125
20182158785
20191983291
20202067474
20211986568
202212172366
2023181297128
20249239181
2025121701101
2026141204—
Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K882729: Mevatron, M 2 Class.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K882729

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026