510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

FACTS

K982010510(k) TraditionalCleared Nov 19, 1998164-day reviewClass II21 CFR 892.1750

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Philips Medical Systems (Cleveland), Inc. · JAK System, X-Ray, Tomography, Computed

Cleared on Nov 19, 1998 as substantially equivalent to K955268 (Philips Medical Systems (Cleveland), Inc., 1996) and 2 other predicates after a 164-day review. Its family tree reaches back 1 generation to 1980.

Decided
Nov 19, 1998
Review
164 days
Class
Class II
Product code
JAK
Recalls
None
Predicates
3

Its longest line of descent runs back 1 generation to K800639 (1980). 3 ancestors in all. No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

Other ancestors, by year cleared 1998: 1 other ancestor1996: 1 other ancestorK800639 · Orbitor · Philips Medical Systems (Cleveland), Inc. · 198019801985199019952000
Other ancestors, by generation 1 generation back: 2 other ancestors K800639 · Orbitor · Philips Medical Systems (Cleveland), Inc. · 19800
  1. Root · 1 generation backK800639 OrbitorPhilips Medical Systems (Cleveland), Inc. · 1980
  2. This deviceK982010 FACTSPhilips Medical Systems (Cleveland), Inc. · 1998
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−1K800639OrbitorPhilips Medical Systems (Cleveland), Inc.1980—
0 (this device)K982010FACTSPhilips Medical Systems (Cleveland), Inc.1998—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
199610
199810
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K982010, 1980–1998Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in JAK? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new JAK device

  1. #1 K230223 iCAC Devicescore 23.5 · 12 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (3)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K955268PQ-2000+ Computed Tomography X-Ray System
Summary page 2
…mbination of legally marketed devices with a SSXI. The intended use of the FACTS is the same as legally marketed device PQ2000+ CT System granted marketing permission in K955268 combined with a C-Arm including the DynaRad Diagnostic Source Assembly cleared in K981267 and a SSXI subject of this 510(k) manuf…
Philips Medical Systems (Cleveland), Inc.19961
*K981267Facts Monoblock
Summary page 2
…me as legally marketed device PQ2000+ CT System granted marketing permission in K955268 combined with a C-Arm including the DynaRad Diagnostic Source Assembly cleared in K981267 and a SSXI subject of this 510(k) manufactured by Varian for Picker that is equivalent to the image intensifier of the Orbitor cl…
Dynarad Corp.1998—
*K800639Orbitor
Summary page 2
…rce Assembly cleared in K981267 and a SSXI subject of this 510(k) manufactured by Varian for Picker that is equivalent to the image intensifier of the Orbitor cleared in K800639. No new questions of safety or effectiveness are raised with the combination and introduction of this device. (4) A description…
Philips Medical Systems (Cleveland), Inc.1980—

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • 1 of the 3 ancestors has a recall of any class.

How does its category compare?

All JAK devices

JAK System, X-Ray, Tomography, Computed: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · JAK

27in 2025

2007: 142008: 262009: 152010: 72011: 162012: 282013: 172014: 302015: 302016: 252017: 292018: 242019: 282020: 302021: 202022: 302023: 272024: 262025: 272026 (partial year): 21
2007high 30 (2014) · low 7 (2010)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · JAK

141in 2025

2007: 27 days median2008: 42 days median2009: 31 days median2010: 92 days median2011: 155 days median2012: 121 days median2013: 132 days median2014: 200 days median2015: 140 days median2016: 129 days median2017: 96 days median2018: 114 days median2019: 94 days median2020: 112 days median2021: 145 days median2022: 131 days median2023: 139 days median2024: 141 days median2025: 141 days median2026 (partial year): 167 days median
2007high 200 (2014) · low 27 (2007)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · JAK

17in 2025

2007: 112008: 162009: 292010: 512011: 342012: 232013: 112014: 102015: 282016: 442017: 332018: 102019: 52020: 82021: 152022: 92023: 92024: 202025: 172026 (partial year): 23
2007high 51 (2010) · low 5 (2019)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · JAK

219in 2025

2007: 762008: 1202009: 1052010: 1192011: 2052012: 1922013: 4142014: 3082015: 4542016: 3652017: 3382018: 5432019: 2332020: 1772021: 2612022: 1992023: 3102024: 2122025: 219
2007high 543 (2018) · low 76 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code JAK, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
200714271176
2008264216120
2009153129105
201079251119
20111615534205
20122812123192
20131713211414
20143020010308
20153014028454
20162512944365
2017299633338
20182411410543
201928945233
2020301128177
20212014515261
2022301319199
2023271399310
20242614120212
20252714117219
20262116723—

What is it indicated for?

The FACTS is Intended to produce routine cross-sectional images of the body by computer reconstruction of x-ray transmission data from the same axlal plane takep at different angles of the entire human body. In addition, this device's fluoroscopic mode is intended to be used in CT interventional procedures and allows some minimally invasive surgical procedures to be implemented with the CT §ystem. Procedures possible with this equipment include tumor biopsies, abscess drainage’s, bone Intervention, visceral, neck trauma evaluation and catheter placement for organ assessment.

Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA summary, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K982010: FACTS.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K982010

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026