510(k) · Cleared
ClearedFACTS
Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly
Philips Medical Systems (Cleveland), Inc. · JAK System, X-Ray, Tomography, Computed
Cleared on Nov 19, 1998 as substantially equivalent to K955268 (Philips Medical Systems (Cleveland), Inc., 1996) and 2 other predicates after a 164-day review. Its family tree reaches back 1 generation to 1980.
- Decided
- Nov 19, 1998
- Review
- 164 days
- Class
- Class II
- Product code
- JAK
- Recalls
- None
- Predicates
- 3
Its longest line of descent runs back 1 generation to K800639 (1980). 3 ancestors in all. No later device cites it as a predicate yet.
- Root · 1 generation backK800639 OrbitorPhilips Medical Systems (Cleveland), Inc. · 1980
- This deviceK982010 FACTSPhilips Medical Systems (Cleveland), Inc. · 1998
View FIG. 1 as a table
Line of descent and top descendants
| Generation | Number | Device | Applicant | Decided | Recalls |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| −1 | K800639 | Orbitor | Philips Medical Systems (Cleveland), Inc. | 1980 | — |
| 0 (this device) | K982010 | FACTS | Philips Medical Systems (Cleveland), Inc. | 1998 | — |
Other ancestors by year cleared
| Year cleared | Devices | With a Class I recall |
|---|---|---|
| 1996 | 1 | 0 |
| 1998 | 1 | 0 |
Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.
Planning a device in JAK? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.
Top candidate predicates for a new JAK device
- #1 K230223 iCAC Devicescore 23.5 · 12 generations · no Class I recall
- #2 Held for the reportin the report
- #3 Held for the reportin the report
What was it cleared against? (3)
Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.
| Type | Number | Device | Decided |
|---|---|---|---|
| * | K955268 | PQ-2000+ Computed Tomography X-Ray SystemSummary page 2…mbination of legally marketed devices with a SSXI. The intended use of the FACTS is the same as legally marketed device PQ2000+ CT System granted marketing permission in K955268 combined with a C-Arm including the DynaRad Diagnostic Source Assembly cleared in K981267 and a SSXI subject of this 510(k) manuf… | 1996 |
| * | K981267 | Facts MonoblockSummary page 2…me as legally marketed device PQ2000+ CT System granted marketing permission in K955268 combined with a C-Arm including the DynaRad Diagnostic Source Assembly cleared in K981267 and a SSXI subject of this 510(k) manufactured by Varian for Picker that is equivalent to the image intensifier of the Orbitor cl… | 1998 |
| * | K800639 | OrbitorSummary page 2…rce Assembly cleared in K981267 and a SSXI subject of this 510(k) manufactured by Varian for Picker that is equivalent to the image intensifier of the Orbitor cleared in K800639. No new questions of safety or effectiveness are raised with the combination and introduction of this device. (4) A description… | 1980 |
What descends from it?
No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.
Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)
No FDA recall names this device.
No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.
What does this lineage say?
- 1 of the 3 ancestors has a recall of any class.
How does its category compare?
All JAK devicesJAK System, X-Ray, Tomography, Computed: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.
FDA decisions per year · JAK
27in 2025
2026 to Oct 25, outlined.
Median 510(k) review, days · JAK
141in 2025
Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.
Recalls per year · JAK
17in 2025
Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified
Adverse event reports per year · JAK
219in 2025
MAUDE reports naming product code JAK, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.
View these four charts as a table
| Year | Decisions | Median 510(k) review, days | Recalls (Class I) | MAUDE reports |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 | 14 | 27 | 11 | 76 |
| 2008 | 26 | 42 | 16 | 120 |
| 2009 | 15 | 31 | 29 | 105 |
| 2010 | 7 | 92 | 51 | 119 |
| 2011 | 16 | 155 | 34 | 205 |
| 2012 | 28 | 121 | 23 | 192 |
| 2013 | 17 | 132 | 11 | 414 |
| 2014 | 30 | 200 | 10 | 308 |
| 2015 | 30 | 140 | 28 | 454 |
| 2016 | 25 | 129 | 44 | 365 |
| 2017 | 29 | 96 | 33 | 338 |
| 2018 | 24 | 114 | 10 | 543 |
| 2019 | 28 | 94 | 5 | 233 |
| 2020 | 30 | 112 | 8 | 177 |
| 2021 | 20 | 145 | 15 | 261 |
| 2022 | 30 | 131 | 9 | 199 |
| 2023 | 27 | 139 | 9 | 310 |
| 2024 | 26 | 141 | 20 | 212 |
| 2025 | 27 | 141 | 17 | 219 |
| 2026 | 21 | 167 | 23 | — |
What is it indicated for?
The FACTS is Intended to produce routine cross-sectional images of the body by computer reconstruction of x-ray transmission data from the same axlal plane takep at different angles of the entire human body. In addition, this device's fluoroscopic mode is intended to be used in CT interventional procedures and allows some minimally invasive surgical procedures to be implemented with the CT §ystem. Procedures possible with this equipment include tumor biopsies, abscess drainage’s, bone Intervention, visceral, neck trauma evaluation and catheter placement for organ assessment.
Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA summary, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.
https://510kreport.com/device/K982010 · printed Nov 6, 2026
Cite this page
510(k) Report. “K982010: FACTS.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K982010
Report an extraction error
Are you the manufacturer?
Record history
- FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
- Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
- Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
- Page last updated Nov 3, 2026