510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

CT Perfusion Option

K993791510(k) TraditionalCleared Nov 24, 199915-day reviewClass II21 CFR 892.1750

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Ge Medical Systems, Inc. · JAK System, X-Ray, Tomography, Computed

Cleared on Nov 24, 1999 as substantially equivalent to K960265 (GE Medical Systems, 1996) after a 15-day review. Its family tree reaches back 2 generations to 1991.

Decided
Nov 24, 1999
Review
15 days
Class
Class II
Product code
JAK
Recalls
None
Predicates
2

Its longest line of descent runs back 2 generations to K913475 (1991). 3 ancestors in all. No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

Other ancestors, by year cleared 1991: 1 other ancestorK913475 · Magnetic Resonance Diagnostic Device · GE Medical Systems · 1991K960265 · Advantage Windows with Functool Option · GE Medical Systems · 1996 · recalled199019921994199619982000
Other ancestors, by generation 2 generations back: 1 other ancestor K960265 · Advantage Windows with Functool Option · GE Medical Systems · 1996 · recalledK913475 · Magnetic Resonance Diagnostic Device · GE Medical Systems · 19910
  1. Root · 2 generations backK913475 Magnetic Resonance Diagnostic DeviceGE Medical Systems · 1991
  2. 1 generation backK960265 Advantage Windows with Functool OptionGE Medical Systems · 1996 · Recalled
  3. This deviceK993791 CT Perfusion OptionGe Medical Systems, Inc. · 1999
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−2K913475Magnetic Resonance Diagnostic DeviceGE Medical Systems1991—
−1K960265Advantage Windows with Functool OptionGE Medical Systems19961
0 (this device)K993791CT Perfusion OptionGe Medical Systems, Inc.1999—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
199110
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K993791, 1991–1999Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in JAK? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new JAK device

  1. #1 K230223 iCAC Devicescore 23.5 · 12 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (2)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary; numbers the summary cites that cannot be its predicate are marked – and kept off the family tree.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K960265Advantage Windows with Functool Option
Summary page 1
…ices: The CT Perfusion is substantially equivalent to the devices listed below: Model: Functool Manufacturer: General Electric Medical Systems, Milwaukee, WI 510(k) #: K960265 Model: CT 9800 Regional Cerebral Blood Flow Manufacturer: General Electric Medical Systems, Milwaukee, W1 510(k) #: 83K0739 Dev…
GE Medical Systems19961
Kept off the family treeK830739FDA’s K830739 is Pro-Guard
Our OCR of the scanned summary read K830739, FDA’s number for Pro-Guard (Surgicot, Inc.). Its FDA name has none of the distinctive words the summary uses for the device it names, “GEMS CT 9800 Regional Cerebral Blood Flow”. Kept off the family tree.
Surgicot, Inc.1983—

Also cleared against K960265: 12 other devices →

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 8 years and passes through 2 companies; a new generation was cleared every 4.7 years on median.
  • 1 of the 3 ancestors has a recall of any class.
  • 12 other devices also cite its predicate K960265.

How does its category compare?

All JAK devices

JAK System, X-Ray, Tomography, Computed: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · JAK

27in 2025

2007: 142008: 262009: 152010: 72011: 162012: 282013: 172014: 302015: 302016: 252017: 292018: 242019: 282020: 302021: 202022: 302023: 272024: 262025: 272026 (partial year): 21
2007high 30 (2014) · low 7 (2010)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · JAK

141in 2025

2007: 27 days median2008: 42 days median2009: 31 days median2010: 92 days median2011: 155 days median2012: 121 days median2013: 132 days median2014: 200 days median2015: 140 days median2016: 129 days median2017: 96 days median2018: 114 days median2019: 94 days median2020: 112 days median2021: 145 days median2022: 131 days median2023: 139 days median2024: 141 days median2025: 141 days median2026 (partial year): 167 days median
2007high 200 (2014) · low 27 (2007)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · JAK

17in 2025

2007: 112008: 162009: 292010: 512011: 342012: 232013: 112014: 102015: 282016: 442017: 332018: 102019: 52020: 82021: 152022: 92023: 92024: 202025: 172026 (partial year): 23
2007high 51 (2010) · low 5 (2019)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · JAK

219in 2025

2007: 762008: 1202009: 1052010: 1192011: 2052012: 1922013: 4142014: 3082015: 4542016: 3652017: 3382018: 5432019: 2332020: 1772021: 2612022: 1992023: 3102024: 2122025: 219
2007high 543 (2018) · low 76 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code JAK, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
200714271176
2008264216120
2009153129105
201079251119
20111615534205
20122812123192
20131713211414
20143020010308
20153014028454
20162512944365
2017299633338
20182411410543
201928945233
2020301128177
20212014515261
2022301319199
2023271399310
20242614120212
20252714117219
20262116723—

What is it indicated for?

CT Perfusion is an image analysis software package that allows the user to produce dynamic image data and to generate information with regard to changes in image intensity over time. It supports the analysis of CT Perfusion images obtained by cine imaging after the injection of contrast and to calculate the various perfusion related parameters (ie: regional cerebral blood flow, regional cerebral blood volume, time to peak). The results are displayed in user-friendly graphic format as parametric images. This software runs on the Advantage Workstation (AW) platform and will aid physicians in the assessment of the extent and type of brain perfusion disturbances.

Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA summary, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K993791: CT Perfusion Option.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K993791

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026