510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Recalled · Class I · 2023

Flexiview 8800 Digital Mobile Imaging System

K003837510(k) TraditionalCleared Mar 12, 200190-day reviewClass II21 CFR 892.1650Recalls 9 (1 Class I)

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Ge Oec Medical Systems · OXO Image-Intensified Fluoroscopic X-Ray System, Mobile

Cleared on Mar 12, 2001 after a 90-day review. FDA has not posted a summary or statement for it, so its predicates are not known. 2 of the 87 devices in its family, counting itself, have a Class I recall. 86 later devices descend from it. It has been recalled 9 times, including a Class I recall.

Decided
Mar 12, 2001
Review
90 days
Class
Class II
Product code
OXO
Recalls
9 (1 Class I)
Predicates
0

86 later devices descend from it, 3 citing it directly. 2 of the 87 devices in this family, counting this one, have a Class I recall.

Descendants, by year cleared 2005: 3 descendants cleared2003: 1 descendant cleared2008: 2 descendants cleared2006: 2 descendants cleared2010: 2 descendants cleared2026: 11 descendants cleared2016: 1 descendant cleared2015: 3 descendants cleared2009: 2 descendants cleared2021: 6 descendants cleared, 1 with a Class I recall12011: 3 descendants cleared2013: 1 descendant cleared2018: 5 descendants cleared2012: 1 descendant cleared2020: 7 descendants cleared2019: 2 descendants cleared2017: 3 descendants cleared2023: 7 descendants cleared2014: 1 descendant cleared2025: 12 descendants cleared2024: 9 descendants cleared2022: 2 descendants cleared200020052010201520202025
  1. This deviceK003837 Flexiview 8800 Digital Mobile Imaging SystemGe Oec Medical Systems · 2001
  2. Descendant · cites it directly · 83 of its ownK032280 Siremobil Iso-C 3DSiemens AG · 2003
  3. Descendant · 2 generations on · 52 of its ownK050996 O-Arm Imaging SystemBreakaway Imaging, LLC · 2005 · Recalled
  4. Descendant · 3 generations on · 51 of its ownK060344 O-Arm Imaging SystemBreakaway Imaging, LLC · 2006 · Recalled
  5. Descendant · 2 generations on · 33 of its ownK081672 C-InsightMazor Surgical Technologies, Ltd. · 2008
  6. Descendant · 3 generations on · 31 of its ownK102130 Tenzing SystemMazor Surgical Technologies, Ltd. · 2010

Showing 5 of 86 descendants. See all descendants

Descendants cleared per year

2003: 12005: 32006: 22008: 22009: 22010: 22011: 32012: 12013: 12014: 12015: 32016: 12017: 32018: 52019: 22020: 72021: 62022: 22023: 72024: 92025: 122026: 11
2003high 12 (2025) · low 0 (2004)2026

Class I recalls in this family

Most influential descendants

Showing 5 of 86 · See all
  • K032280Siremobil Iso-C 3DSiemens AG · 2003 · cites it directly83descendants
  • K050996O-Arm Imaging SystemBreakaway Imaging, LLC · 2005 · 2 generations on52descendants
  • K060344O-Arm Imaging SystemBreakaway Imaging, LLC · 2006 · 3 generations on51descendants
  • K081672C-InsightMazor Surgical Technologies, Ltd. · 2008 · 2 generations on33descendants
  • K102130Tenzing SystemMazor Surgical Technologies, Ltd. · 2010 · 3 generations on31descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
0 (this device)K003837Flexiview 8800 Digital Mobile Imaging SystemGe Oec Medical Systems2001—
+1K032280Siremobil Iso-C 3DSiemens AG2003—
+2K050996O-Arm Imaging SystemBreakaway Imaging, LLC20054
+3K060344O-Arm Imaging SystemBreakaway Imaging, LLC20061
+2K081672C-InsightMazor Surgical Technologies, Ltd.2008—
+3K102130Tenzing SystemMazor Surgical Technologies, Ltd.2010—

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
200310
200530
200620
200820
200920
201020
201130
201210
201310
201410
201530
201610
201730
201850
201920
202070
202161
202220
202370
202490
2025120
2026110
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K003837, 2001–2026Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

2 devices in this family have a Class I recall. A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new OXO device

  1. #1 K253296 Digital C-ARM with 3Dscore 15.1 · 13 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against?

FDA has not posted a summary or statement for it, so its predicates are not known.

What descends from it? (86)

See all 86

3 later devices cite it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K032280Siremobil Iso-C 3DSiemens AG200383
K051490GE Oec Everview 7500Ge Oec Medical Systems, Inc.20050
K050866Centrion 500 C-Arm SystemOsteosys Co.,Ltd20050

Has anything in its family been recalled? (2 Class I)

Recalls of this device

DateClassRecallRoot causeReason
May 15, 2023Class IIZ-2279-2023Process controlImage intensifiers on systems, used to provide fluoroscopic/digital spot images can become detached if the systems encounter a large impact force when moved, which may result in the image intensifier falling, which could lead to injuries…
May 15, 2023Class IIZ-2275-2023Process controlImage intensifiers on systems, used to provide fluoroscopic/digital spot images can become detached if the systems encounter a large impact force when moved, which may result in the image intensifier falling, which could lead to injuries…
Feb 21, 2017Class IIZ-1469-2017Process controlOEC FlexiView 8800 workstation power cable assembly issue which can result in a loss of imaging functionality due to intermittent power cord failures.
Oct 3, 2014Class IIZ-0194-2015Component design/selectionGE Healthcare initiated a field correction because prior revision of components were potentially installed on certain OEC 9800, FlexiView 8800, OEC MiniView 6800 and OEC UroView 2800 systems.
Nov 19, 2007Class IIZ-2027-2012Device DesignPlease be aware that this is not a new recall. The firm has taken action; but, due to administrative issues this recall is now being classified by the Agency. GE OEC recalled imaging devices OEC 9900, OEC 9800, and OEC 8800 as a result of…
Oct 19, 2007Class IIZ-2221-2012Nonconforming Material/ComponentX-ray units did not meet manufacturer's specification for linearity.
Jun 12, 2007Not classifiedZ-0850-2007OtherX-ray systems were not configured to display Air Kerma Rate and Cumulative Air Kerma.
Mar 1, 2007Not classifiedZ-0678-2007OtherDuring routine service, primary and/or secondary collimators may not have been properly reinstalled.
Nov 20, 2006Class IZ-2065-2012Device DesignPlease be aware that this is not a new recall. The firm has taken action; but, due to administrative issues this recall is now being classified by the Agency. The OEC 8800 Flexview was recalled in November 2006 due to several intermittent…

Relatives with a Class I recall

Class I is FDA’s most serious recall class. A recall in the family tree is context for this device, not evidence about it.

  • K211616ExcelsiusHubGlobus Medical, Inc. · 2021 · 5 generations on · ◆ in the 2021 descendants bar of FIG. 11 Class I recall

What does this lineage say?

  • Of its descendants, K032280 (Siemens AG, 2003) has gone furthest, with 83 descendants of its own.

How does its category compare?

All OXO devices

OXO Image-Intensified Fluoroscopic X-Ray System, Mobile: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · OXO

4in 2025

2010: 12012: 42013: 22014: 22015: 12016: 32017: 42018: 12019: 32021: 22024: 22025: 42026 (partial year): 2
2007high 4 (2012) · low 0 (2007)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · OXO

97in 2025

2012: 48 days median2016: 128 days median2017: 57 days median2019: 213 days median2025: 97 days median
2007high 213 (2019) · low 48 (2012)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · OXO

4in 2024

2012: 42013: 32014: 42016: 32017: 42018: 112024: 42026 (partial year): 1
2007high 11 (2018) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · OXO

118in 2025

2012: 52013: 412014: 892015: 972016: 3,8202017: 1,6972018: 1,6472019: 1,2972020: 8162021: 5542022: 2952023: 2752024: 1922025: 118
2007high 3,820 (2016) · low 0 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code OXO, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20070—00
20080—00
20090—00
20101—00
20110—00
201244845
20132—341
20142—489
20151—097
2016312833,820
201745741,697
20181—111,647
2019321301,297
20200—0816
20212—0554
20220—0295
20230—0275
20242—4192
20254970118
20262—1—
Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K003837: Flexiview 8800 Digital Mobile Imaging System.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K003837

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026