510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Intess Lumbar Cage

K123100510(k) TraditionalCleared Mar 28, 2013177-day reviewClass II21 CFR 888.3080

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Kalitec Direct, LLC · MAX Intervertebral Fusion Device With Bone Graft, Lumbar

Cleared on Mar 28, 2013 as substantially equivalent to K071724 (Spinal Elements, Inc., 2007) and 3 other predicates after a 177-day review. Its family tree reaches back 2 generations to 2007. 5 later devices descend from it.

Decided
Mar 28, 2013
Review
177 days
Class
Class II
Product code
MAX
Recalls
None
Predicates
4

Its longest line of descent runs back 2 generations to K071724 (2007). 5 ancestors in all, the oldest P950019 (1996). 5 later devices descend from it, 2 citing it directly.

Other ancestors, by year clearedDescendants, by year cleared 1999: 1 other ancestor1996: 1 other ancestor2007: 1 other ancestor2022: 1 descendant cleared2019: 1 descendant cleared2023: 1 descendant cleared2026: 2 descendants clearedK071724 · Lucent · Spinal Elements, Inc. · 2007K081968 · Modification to Lucent · Spinal Elements, Inc. · 20081995200020052010201520202025
Other ancestors, by generationDescendants, by generation 1 generation back: 2 other ancestors2 generations back: 1 other ancestor 1 generation forward: 2 descendants2 generations forward: 1 descendant3 generations forward: 2 descendants K081968 · Modification to Lucent · Spinal Elements, Inc. · 2008K071724 · Lucent · Spinal Elements, Inc. · 20070
  1. Root · 2 generations backK071724 LucentSpinal Elements, Inc. · 2007
  2. 1 generation backK081968 Modification to LucentSpinal Elements, Inc. · 2008
  3. This deviceK123100 Intess Lumbar CageKalitec Direct, LLC · 2013
  4. Descendant · cites it directly · 3 of its ownK182210 TiWAVE-L Porous Titanium Lumbar CageKalitec Medical, LLC · 2019
  5. Descendant · 2 generations on · 2 of its ownK222988 neoWave LS Lumbar Straight, neoWave C Cervical, and Ti3D CervicalHt Medical D.B.A. Xenix Medical · 2023
  6. Descendant · 3 generations on · 0 of its ownK252240 Spectrum Spine Cervical Cage System; Spectrum Spine Lumbar Cage SystemSpectrum Spine · 2026
  7. Descendant · 3 generations on · 0 of its ownK253583 LUX Expandable Lumbar Interbody SystemXenix Medical · 2026
  8. Descendant · cites it directly · 0 of its ownK220902 Navagio Lumbar CageKalitec Medical, LLC · 2022

Most influential descendants

Showing 5 of 5 · See all
  • K182210TiWAVE-L Porous Titanium Lumbar CageKalitec Medical, LLC · 2019 · cites it directly3descendants
  • K222988neoWave LS Lumbar Straight, neoWave C Cervical, and Ti3D CervicalHt Medical D.B.A. Xenix Medical · 2023 · 2 generations on2descendants
  • K252240Spectrum Spine Cervical Cage System; Spectrum Spine Lumbar Cage SystemSpectrum Spine · 2026 · 3 generations on0descendants
  • K253583LUX Expandable Lumbar Interbody SystemXenix Medical · 2026 · 3 generations on0descendants
  • K220902Navagio Lumbar CageKalitec Medical, LLC · 2022 · cites it directly0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−2K071724LucentSpinal Elements, Inc.2007—
−1K081968Modification to LucentSpinal Elements, Inc.2008—
0 (this device)K123100Intess Lumbar CageKalitec Direct, LLC2013—
+1K182210TiWAVE-L Porous Titanium Lumbar CageKalitec Medical, LLC2019—
+2K222988neoWave LS Lumbar Straight, neoWave C Cervical, and Ti3D CervicalHt Medical D.B.A. Xenix Medical2023—
+3K252240Spectrum Spine Cervical Cage System; Spectrum Spine Lumbar Cage SystemSpectrum Spine2026—
+3K253583LUX Expandable Lumbar Interbody SystemXenix Medical2026—
+1K220902Navagio Lumbar CageKalitec Medical, LLC2022—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
199610
199910
200710

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
201910
202210
202310
202620
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K123100, 2007–2026Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in MAX? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new MAX device

  1. #1 K203714 NuVasive Thoracolumbar Interbody Systems…score 102.5 · 24 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (4)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K071724Lucent
Summary page 1
…CFR section: 21 CFR section 888. Device panel: Orthopedic Lucent Straight Intervertebral Body Fusion Device - K071724/K081968 Legally Marketed BRANTIGAN I/F CAGE - P960025 Predicate Device: RAY THREADED LUMBAR FUSION CA…
Spinal Elements, Inc.2007—
*K081968Modification to Lucent
Summary page 1
…CFR section: 21 CFR section 888. Device panel: Orthopedic Lucent Straight Intervertebral Body Fusion Device - K071724/K081968 Legally Marketed BRANTIGAN I/F CAGE - P960025 Predicate Device: RAY THREADED LUMBAR FUSION CAGE (P950…
Spinal Elements, Inc.2008—
*P960025Brantigen I/F Cage (R) Used with VSP (R) Spine Plates and Pedicle Screws
Summary page 1
…panel: Orthopedic Lucent Straight Intervertebral Body Fusion Device - K071724/K081968 Legally Marketed BRANTIGAN I/F CAGE - P960025 Predicate Device: RAY THREADED LUMBAR FUSION CAGE (P950019) Submitter: Dayne Pope…
Depuy Spine, Inc.1999—
*P950019Ray Threaded Fusion Cage (TFC)(TM) with Instrumentation
Summary page 1
…rtebral Body Fusion Device - K071724/K081968 Legally Marketed BRANTIGAN I/F CAGE - P960025 Predicate Device: RAY THREADED LUMBAR FUSION CAGE (P950019) Submitter: Dayne Pope Kalitec Direct, LLC…
Stryker Spine19961

Also cleared against K071724: 38 other devices →

What descends from it? (5)

2 later devices cite it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K182210TiWAVE-L Porous Titanium Lumbar CageKalitec Medical, LLC20193
K220902Navagio Lumbar CageKalitec Medical, LLC20220

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 6 years and passes through 2 companies; a new generation was cleared every 4.6 years on median.
  • 1 of the 5 ancestors has a recall of any class.
  • Of its descendants, K182210 (Kalitec Medical, LLC, 2019) has gone furthest, with 3 descendants of its own.
  • 38 other devices also cite its predicate K071724.

How does its category compare?

All MAX devices

MAX Intervertebral Fusion Device With Bone Graft, Lumbar: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2013, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · MAX

29in 2025

2007: 72008: 352009: 312010: 292011: 492012: 482013: 582014: 582015: 532016: 642017: 762018: 642019: 602020: 562021: 532022: 412023: 302024: 382025: 292026 (partial year): 18
2007high 76 (2017) · low 7 (2007)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · MAX

85in 2025

2007: 86 days median2008: 88 days median2009: 102 days median2010: 137 days median2011: 98 days median2012: 69 days median2013: 102 days median2014: 115 days median2015: 113 days median2016: 124 days median2017: 116 days median2018: 114 days median2019: 131 days median2020: 106 days median2021: 109 days median2022: 95 days median2023: 87 days median2024: 91 days median2025: 85 days median2026 (partial year): 95 days median
2007high 137 (2010) · low 69 (2012)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · MAX

5in 2025

2008: 22009: 92011: 32012: 11, 1 Class I2014: 32015: 12016: 62017: 12018: 42019: 12022: 12024: 12025: 5
2007high 11 (2012) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (1 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · MAX

811in 2025

2007: 122008: 192009: 902010: 1542011: 2012012: 3272013: 3802014: 3662015: 5242016: 6472017: 5962018: 6162019: 6992020: 6402021: 6222022: 6182023: 5762024: 7292025: 811
2007high 811 (2025) · low 12 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code MAX, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
2007786012
20083588219
200931102990
2010291370154
201149983201
2012486911 (1)327
2013581020380
2014581153366
2015531131524
2016641246647
2017761161596
2018641144616
2019601311699
2020561060640
2021531090622
202241951618
202330870576
202438911729
202529855811
202618950—

What is it indicated for?

The INTESS Lumbar Cage is indicated for intervertebral body fusion procedures in skeletally mature patients with degenerative disc disease (ODD) of the lumbar spine at one or two contiguous levels from U2-Si. Degenerative disc disease is defined as discogenic back pain with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies. These DD patients may have up to Grade 1 spondylolisthesis or retrolisthesis at the involved level(s). INTESS…

Read the full statement (137 words)

The INTESS Lumbar Cage is indicated for intervertebral body fusion procedures in skeletally mature patients with degenerative disc disease (ODD) of the lumbar spine at one or two contiguous levels from U2-Si. Degenerative disc disease is defined as discogenic back pain with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies. These DD patients may have up to Grade 1 spondylolisthesis or retrolisthesis at the involved level(s). INTESS Lumbar Cage implants are to be used with autogenous bone graft and implanted via a transforaminal approach, or an open posterior or lateral approach. The INTESS Lumbar Cage implants are to be used with supplemental fixation. Patients should have at least (6) months of non-operative treatment prior to treatment with an intervertebral cage. Patients with previous non-fusion spinal surgery at involved level may be treated with the device.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K123100: Intess Lumbar Cage.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K123100

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026