510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Recalled · Class II · 2021

Gemini Condor

K081135510(k) TraditionalCleared Apr 29, 20088-day reviewClass II21 CFR 892.1200Recalls 13

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Philips Medical Systems (Cleveland), Inc. · KPS System, Tomography, Computed, Emission

Cleared on Apr 29, 2008 as substantially equivalent to K052640 (Philips Medical Systems (Cleveland), Inc., 2005) and 1 other predicate after an 8-day review. Its family tree reaches back 9 generations to 1993. It has been recalled 13 times.

Decided
Apr 29, 2008
Review
8 days
Class
Class II
Product code
KPS
Recalls
13
Predicates
2

Its longest line of descent runs back 9 generations to K930090 (1993). 24 ancestors in all. No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

  1. Root · 9 generations backK930090 HelicatElscint, Inc. · 1993
  2. 5 generations between
  3. 3 generations backK042935 Gemini GXLPhilips Medical Systems (Cleveland), Inc. · 2004 · Recalled
  4. 2 generations backK051170 Gemini GXLPhilips Medical Systems (Cleveland), Inc. · 2005 · Recalled
  5. 1 generation backK052640 Gemini RaptorPhilips Medical Systems (Cleveland), Inc. · 2005 · Recalled
  6. This deviceK081135 Gemini CondorPhilips Medical Systems (Cleveland), Inc. · 2008
Show all 9 generations
  1. Root · 9 generations backK930090 HelicatElscint, Inc. · 1993
  2. 8 generations backK961464 Select/SPElscint, Inc. · 1996 · Recalled
  3. 7 generations backK982060 Volumax CT Imaging SystemElscint, Inc. · 1998
  4. 6 generations backK012009 MX8000 Idt CT SystemMarconi Medical Systems, Inc. · 2001 · Recalled
  5. 5 generations backK032036 Gemini 16Philips Medical Systems (Cleveland), Inc. · 2003 · Recalled
  6. 4 generations backK041955 Gemini Pet/CT Imaging SystemPhilips Medical Systems (Cleveland), Inc. · 2004 · Recalled
  7. 3 generations backK042935 Gemini GXLPhilips Medical Systems (Cleveland), Inc. · 2004 · Recalled
  8. 2 generations backK051170 Gemini GXLPhilips Medical Systems (Cleveland), Inc. · 2005 · Recalled
  9. 1 generation backK052640 Gemini RaptorPhilips Medical Systems (Cleveland), Inc. · 2005 · Recalled
  10. This deviceK081135 Gemini CondorPhilips Medical Systems (Cleveland), Inc. · 2008
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−9K930090HelicatElscint, Inc.1993—
−8K961464Select/SPElscint, Inc.19963
−7K982060Volumax CT Imaging SystemElscint, Inc.1998—
−6K012009MX8000 Idt CT SystemMarconi Medical Systems, Inc.200161
−5K032036Gemini 16Philips Medical Systems (Cleveland), Inc.20032
−4K041955Gemini Pet/CT Imaging SystemPhilips Medical Systems (Cleveland), Inc.20042
−3K042935Gemini GXLPhilips Medical Systems (Cleveland), Inc.20042
−2K051170Gemini GXLPhilips Medical Systems (Cleveland), Inc.200512
−1K052640Gemini RaptorPhilips Medical Systems (Cleveland), Inc.200536
0 (this device)K081135Gemini CondorPhilips Medical Systems (Cleveland), Inc.2008—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
199420
199510
199710
200030
200130
200330
200420
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K081135, 1993–2008Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in KPS? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new KPS device

  1. #1 K253564 uMI Panvivo (uMI Panvivo); uMI Panvivo (uMI…score 18.6 · 17 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (2)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K052640Gemini Raptor
Summary page 1
…and 90 JAK Classification Panel: Radiology C. Date prepared: March 17, 2008 D. Predicate Device: GEMINI Raptor System (K052640) (GEMINI TF) AcQSim Multislice CT Scanner (K033357)…
Philips Medical Systems (Cleveland), Inc.200536
*K033357Acqsim-Multislice-CT, Model 453567042271
Summary page 1
…ice: GEMINI Raptor System (K052640) (GEMINI TF) AcQSim Multislice CT Scanner (K033357) (Brilliance CT Big Bore) E. Performance Standards: * 21 CFR 1020.30 - 1020.33 Performance S…
Philips Medical Systems (Cleveland), Inc.200450

Also cleared against K052640: 5 other devices →

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

Recalls of this device

DateClassRecallRoot causeReason
May 1, 2021Class IIZ-1989-2021Device DesignSignificant wear of the Monitor Bracket Assembly shaft goes unrecognized could potentially lead to the Monitor Bracket Assembly detaching from the Suspension Arm and result in potential hazard for the monitor to fall while remaining…
Jul 1, 2015Class IIZ-2199-2015Software designPhilips has identified four (4) software defects in the Tumor LOC software application that may potentially result in irradiation of healthy tissue or non-irradiation of diseased tissue.
Mar 6, 2015Class IIZ-1789-2015Nonconforming Material/ComponentThe firm was notified that the failure of the UPS accessory devices used in conjunction with Computed Tomography X-ray systems and Diagnostic Imaging systems. may result in battery acid leakage, overheating and/or emission of fumes.
Jun 18, 2014Class IIZ-2037-2014Software designWhen beginning a procedure to start the gantry and CT Host, a Close Estop message may appear to the operator, but disappears before action can be taken. If this occurs it results in an inability to close E-Stop and the system is not…
Dec 5, 2013Class IIZ-0979-2014Software designThe TF Big Bore patient table experienced mechanical binding during horizontal table motion resulting in an automatic Emergency Stop (E-stop). An E-Stop will interrupt a current scan, resulting in an incomplete study.
Dec 4, 2013Class IIZ-0932-2014Software designThe PET Reconstruction Server (PRS) database may randomly lock up after the low dose CT acquisition is complete and will not allow the PET acquisition to begin, resulting in an unexpected incomplete study.
Oct 24, 2012Class IIZ-0883-2013Software designSoftware anomaly. Philips determined that the TumorLOC software program for the referenced PET/CT X-Ray scanning systems has the capability to generate Intensity Projection data sets from respiratory gated data. A circumstance was…
Aug 8, 2012Class IIZ-2239-2012Material/Component ContaminationPhilips became aware of an issue relating to a UPS battery cabinet that appeared to have burned a hole through the casing on one of the batteries. Supplier of the UPS, Chloride/Emerson, determined the batteries, housed within the UPS…
Jan 26, 2012Not classifiedZ-1369-2012Software design (manufacturing process)TumorLOC will save the incorrect contour when the user saves the contour while in the edit mode, and the software does not force the user to exit the edit mode before saving. In TumorLOC, when saving while a contour is in edit mode, that…
May 31, 2011Not classifiedZ-3201-2011Software designThe firm is conducting a recall/software correction to several of their GEMINI PET/CT X-ray system units in the field. The firm believes that if these software defects were to recur, it could impact the performance of reliability of the…
Apr 25, 2011Not classifiedZ-0343-2012Software designIn response to complaints received by Philips Medical concerning certain identified software errors reported by their customers, the firm is conducting a recall/software correction to several of their GEMINI PET/CT X-ray system units in…
Apr 25, 2011Not classifiedZ-0344-2012Software designIn response to complaints received by Philips Medical concerning certain identified software errors reported by their customers, the firm is conducting a recall/software correction to several of their GEMINI PET/CT X-ray system units in…
Aug 5, 2009Not classifiedZ-2915-2011Software design (manufacturing process)Two non-safety related defects have been found on the Philips GEMINI TF Big Bore running version 3.6; if these defects were to recur, it could impact the performance or reliability of the system. Philips is issuing a software update to…

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 15 years and passes through 3 companies; a new generation was cleared every 1.8 years on median.
  • 15 of the 24 ancestors have a recall of any class.
  • 5 other devices also cite its predicate K052640.

How does its category compare?

All KPS devices

KPS System, Tomography, Computed, Emission: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2008, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · KPS

12in 2025

2007: 82008: 172009: 92010: 32011: 72012: 62013: 112014: 112015: 32016: 112017: 112018: 132019: 32020: 122021: 152022: 52023: 122024: 112025: 122026 (partial year): 6
2007high 17 (2008) · low 3 (2010)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · KPS

65in 2025

2007: 38 days median2008: 25 days median2009: 42 days median2010: 91 days median2011: 28 days median2012: 94 days median2013: 84 days median2014: 92 days median2015: 112 days median2016: 65 days median2017: 104 days median2018: 59 days median2019: 60 days median2020: 72 days median2021: 66 days median2022: 60 days median2023: 63 days median2024: 59 days median2025: 65 days median2026 (partial year): 67 days median
2007high 112 (2015) · low 25 (2008)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · KPS

16in 2025

2007: 222008: 162009: 142010: 42011: 342012: 132013: 132014: 182015: 52016: 162017: 112018: 12, 3 Class I2019: 5, 5 Class I2020: 82021: 42022: 8, 6 Class I2023: 6, 3 Class I2024: 152025: 162026 (partial year): 6
2007high 34 (2011) · low 4 (2010)2026

Class I (17 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · KPS

36in 2025

2007: 382008: 112009: 152010: 442011: 562012: 342013: 2402014: 332015: 242016: 102017: 312018: 262019: 1052020: 222021: 102022: 152023: 222024: 232025: 36
2007high 240 (2013) · low 10 (2016)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code KPS, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20078382238
200817251611
20099421415
2010391444
20117283456
20126941334
2013118413240
201411921833
20153112524
201611651610
2017111041131
2018135912 (3)26
20193605 (5)105
20201272822
20211566410
20225608 (6)15
202312636 (3)22
202411591523
202512651636
20266676—

What is it indicated for?

The device is a diagnostic imaging system for fixed or mobile installations that combines Positron Emission Tomography (PET) and X-ray Computed Tomography (CT) systems. The CT subsystem produces cross-sectional images of the body by computer reconstruction of x-ray transmission data. The PET subsystem produces images of the distribution of PET radiopharmaceuticals in the patient body (specific radiopharmaceuticals are used for whole body, brain, heart…

Read the full statement (278 words)

The device is a diagnostic imaging system for fixed or mobile installations that combines Positron Emission Tomography (PET) and X-ray Computed Tomography (CT) systems. The CT subsystem produces cross-sectional images of the body by computer reconstruction of x-ray transmission data. The PET subsystem produces images of the distribution of PET radiopharmaceuticals in the patient body (specific radiopharmaceuticals are used for whole body, brain, heart and other organ imaging). Attenuation correction is accomplished by CTAC. The device also provides for list mode, dynamic, and gated acquisitions.

Image processing and display workstations provide software applications to process, analyze, display, quantify and interpret medical images/data. The PET and CT images may be registered and displayed in a "fused" (overlaid in the same spatial orientation) format to provide combined metabolic and anatomical data at different angles. Trained professionals use the images in:

o The evaluation, detection and diagnosis of lesions, disease and organ function such as but not limited to cancer, cardiovascular disease, and neurological disorders.

o The detection, localization, and staging of tumors and diagnosing cancer patients.

o Treatment planning and interventional radiology procedures.

The device includes software that provides a quantified analysis of regional cerebral activity from PET images.

Cardiac imaging software provides functionality for the quantification of cardiology images and datasets including but not limited to myocardial perfusion for the display of wall motion and quantification of left-ventricular function parameters from gated myocardial perfusion studies and for the 3D alignment of coronary artery images from CT coronary angiography onto the myocardium.

Both subsystems (PET and CT) can also be operated independently as fully functional, diagnostic imaging systems including application of the CT scanner as a radiation therapy simulation scanner.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K081135: Gemini Condor.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 5, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K081135

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026