510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Recalled · Class II · 2015

Ingenuity TF Pet/MR

K103483510(k) TraditionalCleared Nov 23, 2011362-day reviewClass II21 CFR 892.1200Recalls 4

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Philips Healthcare (Cleveland) · OUO Tomographic Imager Combining Emission Computed Tomography With Nuclear Magnetic Resonance

Cleared on Nov 23, 2011 as substantially equivalent to K052640 (Philips Medical Systems (Cleveland), Inc., 2005) and 1 other predicate after a 362-day review. Its family tree reaches back 9 generations to 1993. 4 of the 30 devices in its family, counting itself, have a Class I recall. It has been recalled 4 times.

Decided
Nov 23, 2011
Review
362 days
Class
Class II
Product code
OUO
Recalls
4
Predicates
2

Its longest line of descent runs back 9 generations to K930090 (1993). 29 ancestors in all. No later device cites it as a predicate yet. 4 of the 30 devices in this family, counting this one, have a Class I recall.

  1. Root · 9 generations backK930090 HelicatElscint, Inc. · 1993
  2. 5 generations between
  3. 3 generations backK042935 Gemini GXLPhilips Medical Systems (Cleveland), Inc. · 2004 · Recalled
  4. 2 generations backK051170 Gemini GXLPhilips Medical Systems (Cleveland), Inc. · 2005 · Recalled
  5. 1 generation backK052640 Gemini RaptorPhilips Medical Systems (Cleveland), Inc. · 2005 · Recalled
  6. This deviceK103483 Ingenuity TF Pet/MRPhilips Healthcare (Cleveland) · 2011
Show all 9 generations
  1. Root · 9 generations backK930090 HelicatElscint, Inc. · 1993
  2. 8 generations backK961464 Select/SPElscint, Inc. · 1996 · Recalled
  3. 7 generations backK982060 Volumax CT Imaging SystemElscint, Inc. · 1998
  4. 6 generations backK012009 MX8000 Idt CT SystemMarconi Medical Systems, Inc. · 2001 · Recalled
  5. 5 generations backK032036 Gemini 16Philips Medical Systems (Cleveland), Inc. · 2003 · Recalled
  6. 4 generations backK041955 Gemini Pet/CT Imaging SystemPhilips Medical Systems (Cleveland), Inc. · 2004 · Recalled
  7. 3 generations backK042935 Gemini GXLPhilips Medical Systems (Cleveland), Inc. · 2004 · Recalled
  8. 2 generations backK051170 Gemini GXLPhilips Medical Systems (Cleveland), Inc. · 2005 · Recalled
  9. 1 generation backK052640 Gemini RaptorPhilips Medical Systems (Cleveland), Inc. · 2005 · Recalled
  10. This deviceK103483 Ingenuity TF Pet/MRPhilips Healthcare (Cleveland) · 2011

Class I recalls in this family

View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−9K930090HelicatElscint, Inc.1993—
−8K961464Select/SPElscint, Inc.19963
−7K982060Volumax CT Imaging SystemElscint, Inc.1998—
−6K012009MX8000 Idt CT SystemMarconi Medical Systems, Inc.200161
−5K032036Gemini 16Philips Medical Systems (Cleveland), Inc.20032
−4K041955Gemini Pet/CT Imaging SystemPhilips Medical Systems (Cleveland), Inc.20042
−3K042935Gemini GXLPhilips Medical Systems (Cleveland), Inc.20042
−2K051170Gemini GXLPhilips Medical Systems (Cleveland), Inc.200512
−1K052640Gemini RaptorPhilips Medical Systems (Cleveland), Inc.200536
0 (this device)K103483Ingenuity TF Pet/MRPhilips Healthcare (Cleveland)2011—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
199420
199510
199710
200030
200140
200340
200421
200522
200711
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K103483, 1993–2011Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

4 devices in this family have a Class I recall. A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new OUO device

  1. #1 K253963 Cubresa BrainPETscore 15.6 · 14 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (2)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K052640Gemini Raptor
Summary page 1
…appropriate safety standards and/or draft standards are used PREDICATE DEVICE(S) The predicate device is the GEMINI IF PET/CT (Raptor), K052640 cleared by FDA on October 7, 2005; and the Achieva 3.OT MRI, K063 559 cleared by FDA on January 4, 2007. INTENDED USE The devi…
Philips Medical Systems (Cleveland), Inc.200536
*K063559Achieva, Intera and Panorama 1.0T, Release 2.5
Summary page 1
…raft standards are used PREDICATE DEVICE(S) The predicate device is the GEMINI IF PET/CT (Raptor), K052640 cleared by FDA on October 7, 2005; and the Achieva 3.OT MRI, K063 559 cleared by FDA on January 4, 2007. INTENDED USE The device is a diagnostic imaging system for fixed or mobile installations th…
Philips Medical Systems2007Class I

Also cleared against K052640: 5 other devices →

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (4 Class I)

Recalls of this device

DateClassRecallRoot causeReason
Jul 23, 2015Class IIZ-2491-2015Software designPhilips Healthcare has become aware of a problem in which the Ingenuity TF PET/MR PET Reconstruction Server (PRS) database may lock up after an MR acquisition is completed and before a PET acquisition is begun, even though no actual…
Mar 11, 2015Class IIZ-1682-2015Software in the Use EnvironmentIt was noticed that the spectroscopy voxel map did not align with the anatomical images of the phantom. This resulted in incorrect orientation of the Chemical Shift Imaging (CSI) data.
Mar 6, 2015Class IIZ-1780-2015Nonconforming Material/ComponentThe firm was notified that the failure of the UPS accessory devices used in conjunction with Computed Tomography X-ray systems and Diagnostic Imaging systems. may result in battery acid leakage, overheating and/or emission of fumes.
Apr 13, 2012Not classifiedZ-1646-2012Software designSoftware errors. A number of non-conformances were identified and corrected by Philips Medical for their Ingenuity TF PET/MRI Systems running software version 3.7.1. The firm states that these non-conformances stemmed from software and/or…

Relatives with a Class I recall

Class I is FDA’s most serious recall class. A recall in the family tree is context for this device, not evidence about it.

  • K063559Achieva, Intera and Panorama 1.0T, Release 2.5Philips Medical Systems · 2007 · Direct predicate · ◆ in the 2007 ancestors bar of FIG. 11 Class I recall
  • K052078Achieva, Intera and Panorama 1.0 Release 2-SeriesPhilips Medical Systems Nederland B.V. · 2005 · 2 generations back · ◆ in the 2005 ancestors bar of FIG. 11 Class I recall
  • K043147Achieva FamilyPhilips Medical Systems North America Co. · 2005 · 2 generations back · ◆ in the 2005 ancestors bar of FIG. 13 Class I recalls
  • K041602Panorama 1.0TPhilips Medical Systems North America, Inc. · 2004 · 2 generations back · ◆ in the 2004 ancestors bar of FIG. 11 Class I recall

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 18 years and passes through 4 companies; a new generation was cleared every 1.8 years on median.
  • 20 of the 29 ancestors have a recall of any class; 4 have a Class I recall.
  • 5 other devices also cite its predicate K052640.

How does its category compare?

All OUO devices

OUO Tomographic Imager Combining Emission Computed Tomography With Nuclear Magnetic Resonance: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2011, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · OUO

1in 2024

2011: 22013: 12014: 12017: 32019: 22020: 12022: 22024: 12026 (partial year): 2
2007high 3 (2017) · low 0 (2007)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · OUO

84in 2017

2017: 84 days median
2007high 84 (2017)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · OUO

1in 2021

2012: 12015: 12020: 12021: 1
2007high 1 (2012) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · OUO

1in 2021

2012: 12013: 12014: 32015: 22017: 22018: 12020: 12021: 1
2007high 3 (2014) · low 0 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code OUO, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20070—00
20080—00
20090—00
20100—00
20112—00
20120—11
20131—01
20141—03
20150—12
20160—00
201738402
20180—01
20192—00
20201—11
20210—11
20222—00
20230—00
20241—00
20250—00
20262—0—

What is it indicated for?

The device is a diagnostic imaging system for fixed installations that combines Positron Emission Tomography (PET) and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI). The system does not expose the patient to ionizing radiation, only the dose contribution from the PET radiopharmaceutical. The MRI subsystem produces cross-sectional images, spectroscopy images and/or spectra in any orientation of the internal structures of the whole body. The PET subsystem produces…

Read the full statement (289 words)

The device is a diagnostic imaging system for fixed installations that combines Positron Emission Tomography (PET) and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI). The system does not expose the patient to ionizing radiation, only the dose contribution from the PET radiopharmaceutical. The MRI subsystem produces cross-sectional images, spectroscopy images and/or spectra in any orientation of the internal structures of the whole body. The PET subsystem produces images of the distribution of PET radiopharmaceuticals in the patient body (specific pharmaceuticals are used for whole body, brain, and other organ imaging). The PET and MRI portions of the system can be used either as an integrated system or as a stand-alone MRI or PET system. The MRI subsystem provides data suitable for use in attenuation correction of the PET acquired data.

Image processing and display work stations provide software applications to process, analyze, display, quantify and interpret medical images/data via a single user interface. The PET and MRI images may be registered and displayed in a fused (overlaid in the same spatial orientation) format to provide combined metabolic and anatomical data at different angles. Trained professional use the images in:

* The evaluation, detection and diagnosis of lesions, disease, and organ function such as but not limited to cancer, cardiovascular disease, and neurological disorders.

* The detection, localization, and staging of tumors and diagnosing cancer patients.

* Treatment planning and interventional radiology procedures.

The device includes software that provides a quantified analysis of regional cerebral activity from the PET images.

The MRI provides capabilities to perform interventional procedures in the head, body, and extremities which may be facilitated by MR techniques, such as real time imaging, such procedures must be performed with MRI compatible instrumentation as selected and evaluated by the clinical user.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K103483: Ingenuity TF Pet/MR.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 4, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K103483

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026