510(k) · Cleared
Recalled · Class II · 2021Philips MX 16 Slice CT System PHASE11, Model 9896 056 56511
Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly
Philips Medical Systems (Cleveland), Inc. · JAK System, X-Ray, Tomography, Computed
Cleared on May 27, 2009 as substantially equivalent to K012009 (Marconi Medical Systems, Inc., 2001) after a 34-day review. Its family tree reaches back 4 generations to 1993. 1 later device descends from it. It has been recalled 8 times.
- Decided
- May 27, 2009
- Review
- 34 days
- Class
- Class II
- Product code
- JAK
- Recalls
- 8
- Predicates
- 1
Its longest line of descent runs back 4 generations to K930090 (1993). 9 ancestors in all. 1 later device descends from it, 1 citing it directly.
- Root · 4 generations backK930090 HelicatElscint, Inc. · 1993
- 3 generations backK961464 Select/SPElscint, Inc. · 1996 · Recalled
- 2 generations backK982060 Volumax CT Imaging SystemElscint, Inc. · 1998
- 1 generation backK012009 MX8000 Idt CT SystemMarconi Medical Systems, Inc. · 2001 · Recalled
- This deviceK091195 Philips MX 16 Slice CT System PHASE11, Model 9896 056 56511Philips Medical Systems (Cleveland), Inc. · 2009
- Descendant · cites it directly · 0 of its ownK191136 Access CTPhilips Healthcare (Suzhou) Co., Ltd. · 2019
Most influential descendants
Showing 1 of 1 · See all- K191136Access CTPhilips Healthcare (Suzhou) Co., Ltd. · 2019 · cites it directly0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table
Line of descent and top descendants
| Generation | Number | Device | Applicant | Decided | Recalls |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| −4 | K930090 | Helicat | Elscint, Inc. | 1993 | — |
| −3 | K961464 | Select/SP | Elscint, Inc. | 1996 | 3 |
| −2 | K982060 | Volumax CT Imaging System | Elscint, Inc. | 1998 | — |
| −1 | K012009 | MX8000 Idt CT System | Marconi Medical Systems, Inc. | 2001 | 61 |
| 0 (this device) | K091195 | Philips MX 16 Slice CT System PHASE11, Model 9896 056 56511 | Philips Medical Systems (Cleveland), Inc. | 2009 | — |
| +1 | K191136 | Access CT | Philips Healthcare (Suzhou) Co., Ltd. | 2019 | — |
Other ancestors by year cleared
| Year cleared | Devices | With a Class I recall |
|---|---|---|
| 1994 | 2 | 0 |
| 1995 | 1 | 0 |
| 1997 | 1 | 0 |
| 2001 | 1 | 0 |
Descendants by year cleared
| Year cleared | Devices | With a Class I recall |
|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 1 | 0 |
Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.
Planning a device in JAK? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.
Top candidate predicates for a new JAK device
- #1 K230223 iCAC Devicescore 23.5 · 12 generations · no Class I recall
- #2 Held for the reportin the report
- #3 Held for the reportin the report
What was it cleared against? (1)
Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.
| Type | Number | Device | Decided |
|---|---|---|---|
| * | K012009 | MX8000 Idt CT SystemSummary page 1…, phase II is of comparable type and substantially equivalent to the legally marketed devices currently in commercial distribution, namely: the Brilliance CT 16-slice in K012009 (a.k.a. MX8000 IDT CT Scanner). It expands the capabilities of the MX 16-slice CT system (K083498). 4. Device Description Th… | 2001 |
What descends from it? (1)
1 later device cites it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.
| Number | Device | Decided | Descendants |
|---|---|---|---|
| K191136 | Access CT | 2019 | 0 |
Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)
Recalls of this device
| Date | Class | Recall | Root cause | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 1, 2021 | Class II | Z-1980-2021 | Device Design | Significant wear of the Monitor Bracket Assembly shaft goes unrecognized could potentially lead to the Monitor Bracket Assembly detaching from the Suspension Arm and result in potential hazard for the monitor to fall while remaining… |
| Apr 20, 2016 | Class II | Z-2346-2016 | Software design | The following issues have been found in MX 16-slice systems with software version 1.1.4.21426: 1. During the filming operation on MX16-slice console software, the clipboard used for copying and pasting images is not cleared between… |
| Apr 20, 2016 | Class II | Z-2347-2016 | Software design | The following issues have been found in MX 16-slice systems with software version 1.1.4.21426: 1. During the filming operation on MX16-slice console software, the clipboard used for copying and pasting images is not cleared between… |
| Mar 6, 2015 | Class II | Z-1759-2015 | Nonconforming Material/Component | The firm was notified that the failure of the UPS accessory devices used in conjunction with Computed Tomography X-ray systems and Diagnostic Imaging systems. may result in battery acid leakage, overheating and/or emission of fumes. |
| Mar 6, 2015 | Class II | Z-1760-2015 | Nonconforming Material/Component | The firm was notified that the failure of the UPS accessory devices used in conjunction with Computed Tomography X-ray systems and Diagnostic Imaging systems. may result in battery acid leakage, overheating and/or emission of fumes. |
| Oct 9, 2014 | Class II | Z-0190-2015 | Software Design Change | "The orientation of images is displayed incorrectly. When operator chooses gantry on the right side from operation console, and the patient position is HFDL, HFDR, FFDL or FFDR, the patient position picture and text is not consistent. "L"… |
| Aug 24, 2012 | Class II | Z-2386-2012 | Process design | On August 24, 2012 the firm recalled the MX 16-slice after discovering that a bolt which attaches the oil accumulator within the gantry may fail, resulting in the oil accumulator detaching from the tube housing assembly within the gantry. |
| Mar 10, 2011 | Not classified | Z-2059-2011 | Other | The Philips MX 16-slice CT scanners are subject to recall/field correction due to a problem encountered with the units when using the 'Combine Viewing' Option. The firm determined that inaccurate dimension measurements display when using… |
The 5 latest of 8 recalls; the web page lists all.
No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.
What does this lineage say?
- The line of descent spans 16 years and passes through 3 companies; a new generation was cleared every 3.3 years on median.
- 3 of the 9 ancestors have a recall of any class.
- Of its descendants, K191136 (Philips Healthcare (Suzhou) Co., Ltd., 2019) has gone furthest, with 0 descendants of its own.
- 10 other devices also cite its predicate K012009.
How does its category compare?
All JAK devicesJAK System, X-Ray, Tomography, Computed: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2009, this device’s year, is highlighted.
FDA decisions per year · JAK
27in 2025
2026 to Oct 25, outlined.
Median 510(k) review, days · JAK
141in 2025
Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.
Recalls per year · JAK
17in 2025
Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified
Adverse event reports per year · JAK
219in 2025
MAUDE reports naming product code JAK, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.
View these four charts as a table
| Year | Decisions | Median 510(k) review, days | Recalls (Class I) | MAUDE reports |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 | 14 | 27 | 11 | 76 |
| 2008 | 26 | 42 | 16 | 120 |
| 2009 | 15 | 31 | 29 | 105 |
| 2010 | 7 | 92 | 51 | 119 |
| 2011 | 16 | 155 | 34 | 205 |
| 2012 | 28 | 121 | 23 | 192 |
| 2013 | 17 | 132 | 11 | 414 |
| 2014 | 30 | 200 | 10 | 308 |
| 2015 | 30 | 140 | 28 | 454 |
| 2016 | 25 | 129 | 44 | 365 |
| 2017 | 29 | 96 | 33 | 338 |
| 2018 | 24 | 114 | 10 | 543 |
| 2019 | 28 | 94 | 5 | 233 |
| 2020 | 30 | 112 | 8 | 177 |
| 2021 | 20 | 145 | 15 | 261 |
| 2022 | 30 | 131 | 9 | 199 |
| 2023 | 27 | 139 | 9 | 310 |
| 2024 | 26 | 141 | 20 | 212 |
| 2025 | 27 | 141 | 17 | 219 |
| 2026 | 21 | 167 | 23 | — |
What is it indicated for?
The Philips MX 16-slice CT system can be used as a Head and Whole Body Computed Tomography X-ray System featuring a continuously rotating x-ray tube and detector array with multislice capability up to 16 slices simultaneously. The acquired x-ray transmission data is reconstructed by computer into cross-sectional images of the body from the same axial plane taken at different angles. The system is suitable for all patients.
Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.
https://510kreport.com/device/K091195 · printed Nov 4, 2026
Cite this page
510(k) Report. “K091195: Philips MX 16 Slice CT System PHASE11, Model 9896 056 56511.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 4, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K091195
Report an extraction error
Are you the manufacturer?
Record history
- FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
- Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
- Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
- Page last updated Nov 3, 2026