510(k) · Cleared
ClearedImr Software Application
Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly
Philips Healthcare (Cleveland) · JAK System, X-Ray, Tomography, Computed
Cleared on Jun 7, 2013 as substantially equivalent to K113483 (Philips Healthcare (Cleveland), 2012) and 1 other predicate after a 199-day review. Its family tree reaches back 7 generations to 1993.
- Decided
- Jun 7, 2013
- Review
- 199 days
- Class
- Class II
- Product code
- JAK
- Recalls
- None
- Predicates
- 2
Its longest line of descent runs back 7 generations to K930090 (1993). 12 ancestors in all. No later device cites it as a predicate yet.
- Root · 7 generations backK930090 HelicatElscint, Inc. · 1993
- 6 generations backK961464 Select/SPElscint, Inc. · 1996 · Recalled
- 5 generations backK982060 Volumax CT Imaging SystemElscint, Inc. · 1998
- 4 generations backK012009 MX8000 Idt CT SystemMarconi Medical Systems, Inc. · 2001 · Recalled
- 3 generations backK033326 Philips Plus Computed Tomography SystemPhilips Medical Systems, Inc. · 2003 · Recalled
- 2 generations backK060937 Brilliance VolumePhilips Medical Systems (Cleveland), Inc. · 2006 · Recalled
- 1 generation backK113483 Iterative Reconstruction Technique Software ApplicationPhilips Healthcare (Cleveland) · 2012
- This deviceK123576 Imr Software ApplicationPhilips Healthcare (Cleveland) · 2013
View FIG. 1 as a table
Line of descent and top descendants
| Generation | Number | Device | Applicant | Decided | Recalls |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| −7 | K930090 | Helicat | Elscint, Inc. | 1993 | — |
| −6 | K961464 | Select/SP | Elscint, Inc. | 1996 | 3 |
| −5 | K982060 | Volumax CT Imaging System | Elscint, Inc. | 1998 | — |
| −4 | K012009 | MX8000 Idt CT System | Marconi Medical Systems, Inc. | 2001 | 61 |
| −3 | K033326 | Philips Plus Computed Tomography System | Philips Medical Systems, Inc. | 2003 | 131 |
| −2 | K060937 | Brilliance Volume | Philips Medical Systems (Cleveland), Inc. | 2006 | 61 |
| −1 | K113483 | Iterative Reconstruction Technique Software Application | Philips Healthcare (Cleveland) | 2012 | — |
| 0 (this device) | K123576 | Imr Software Application | Philips Healthcare (Cleveland) | 2013 | — |
Other ancestors by year cleared
| Year cleared | Devices | With a Class I recall |
|---|---|---|
| 1994 | 2 | 0 |
| 1995 | 1 | 0 |
| 1997 | 1 | 0 |
| 2001 | 1 | 0 |
Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.
Planning a device in JAK? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.
Top candidate predicates for a new JAK device
- #1 K230223 iCAC Devicescore 23.5 · 12 generations · no Class I recall
- #2 Held for the reportin the report
- #3 Held for the reportin the report
What was it cleared against? (2)
Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.
| Type | Number | Device | Decided |
|---|---|---|---|
| * | K113483 | Iterative Reconstruction Technique Software ApplicationSummary page 1…n is comparable in type and substantial equivalence to the legally marketed devices currently in. commercial distribution, namely: a. Philips IRT Software Application — K113483 b. Philips Brilliance Volume CT System — KO60937 4. Device Description The IMR reconstruction feature is intended as an altern… | 2012 |
| * | K060937 | Brilliance VolumeSummary page 2…nd dose reduction claims, as evaluated via a human observer study. Therefore, IMR expands on the capabilities of IRT. Predicate '510(k) Number Cieared Brilliance Volume K060937 June 5, 2006 Philips IRT Software K113483 September 26, 2012 Application 7. Safety The Philips IMR software application is manuf… | 2006 |
What descends from it?
No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.
Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)
No FDA recall names this device.
No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.
What does this lineage say?
- The line of descent spans 20 years and passes through 5 companies; a new generation was cleared every 2.6 years on median.
- 5 of the 12 ancestors have a recall of any class.
How does its category compare?
All JAK devicesJAK System, X-Ray, Tomography, Computed: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2013, this device’s year, is highlighted.
FDA decisions per year · JAK
27in 2025
2026 to Oct 25, outlined.
Median 510(k) review, days · JAK
141in 2025
Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.
Recalls per year · JAK
17in 2025
Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified
Adverse event reports per year · JAK
219in 2025
MAUDE reports naming product code JAK, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.
View these four charts as a table
| Year | Decisions | Median 510(k) review, days | Recalls (Class I) | MAUDE reports |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 | 14 | 27 | 11 | 76 |
| 2008 | 26 | 42 | 16 | 120 |
| 2009 | 15 | 31 | 29 | 105 |
| 2010 | 7 | 92 | 51 | 119 |
| 2011 | 16 | 155 | 34 | 205 |
| 2012 | 28 | 121 | 23 | 192 |
| 2013 | 17 | 132 | 11 | 414 |
| 2014 | 30 | 200 | 10 | 308 |
| 2015 | 30 | 140 | 28 | 454 |
| 2016 | 25 | 129 | 44 | 365 |
| 2017 | 29 | 96 | 33 | 338 |
| 2018 | 24 | 114 | 10 | 543 |
| 2019 | 28 | 94 | 5 | 233 |
| 2020 | 30 | 112 | 8 | 177 |
| 2021 | 20 | 145 | 15 | 261 |
| 2022 | 30 | 131 | 9 | 199 |
| 2023 | 27 | 139 | 9 | 310 |
| 2024 | 26 | 141 | 20 | 212 |
| 2025 | 27 | 141 | 17 | 219 |
| 2026 | 21 | 167 | 23 | — |
What is it indicated for?
The IMR reconstruction feature is intended as an alternative to standard reconstruction methods (filtered back projection) for the reconstruction of CT scanner data to produce diagnostic images. The IMR reconstruction feature is designed to reduce image noise, increase high-contrast spatial resolution, and improve low contrast detectability. IMR is designed to reduce dose required for diagnostic CT imaging. Image quality improvements and dose reduction…
Read the full statement (109 words)
The IMR reconstruction feature is intended as an alternative to standard reconstruction methods (filtered back projection) for the reconstruction of CT scanner data to produce diagnostic images. The IMR reconstruction feature is designed to reduce image noise, increase high-contrast spatial resolution, and improve low contrast detectability. IMR is designed to reduce dose required for diagnostic CT imaging. Image quality improvements and dose reduction depend on the clinical task, patient size, anatomical location, and clinical practice. IMR images will be used by a trained medical professional for diagnosis of clinical conditions in patients, including pediatrics and adults, who have been prescribed a CT scan as part of their clinical care
Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA summary, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.
https://510kreport.com/device/K123576 · printed Nov 4, 2026
Cite this page
510(k) Report. “K123576: Imr Software Application.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 4, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K123576
Report an extraction error
Are you the manufacturer?
Record history
- FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
- Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
- Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
- Page last updated Nov 3, 2026