510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Brilliance Dual Energy Option

K090462510(k) TraditionalCleared Jun 23, 2009120-day reviewClass II21 CFR 892.1750

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Philips Medical Systems (Cleveland), Inc. · JAK System, X-Ray, Tomography, Computed

Cleared on Jun 23, 2009 as substantially equivalent to K060937 (Philips Medical Systems (Cleveland), Inc., 2006) and 1 other predicate after a 120-day review. Its family tree reaches back 6 generations to 1993. 3 later devices descend from it.

Decided
Jun 23, 2009
Review
120 days
Class
Class II
Product code
JAK
Recalls
None
Predicates
2

Its longest line of descent runs back 6 generations to K930090 (1993). 16 ancestors in all. 3 later devices descend from it, 1 citing it directly.

Other ancestors, by year clearedDescendants, by year cleared 2008: 1 other ancestor2006: 1 other ancestor2004: 1 other ancestor2001: 2 other ancestors2003: 1 other ancestor1997: 1 other ancestor1995: 1 other ancestor1994: 2 other ancestors2010: 1 descendant cleared2011: 1 descendant cleared2012: 1 descendant clearedK930090 · Helicat · Elscint, Inc. · 1993K961464 · Select/SP · Elscint, Inc. · 1996 · recalledK982060 · Volumax CT Imaging System · Elscint, Inc. · 1998K012009 · MX8000 Idt CT System · Marconi Medical Systems, Inc. · 2001 · recalledK033326 · Philips Plus Computed Tomography System · Philips Medical Systems, Inc. · 2003 · recalledK060937 · Brilliance Volume · Philips Medical Systems (Cleveland), Inc. · 2006 · recalled1990200020102020
Other ancestors, by generationDescendants, by generation 1 generation back: 1 other ancestor2 generations back: 1 other ancestor3 generations back: 2 other ancestors4 generations back: 1 other ancestor5 generations back: 4 other ancestors6 generations back: 1 other ancestor 1 generation forward: 1 descendant2 generations forward: 1 descendant3 generations forward: 1 descendant K060937 · Brilliance Volume · Philips Medical Systems (Cleveland), Inc. · 2006 · recalledK033326 · Philips Plus Computed Tomography System · Philips Medical Systems, Inc. · 2003 · recalledK012009 · MX8000 Idt CT System · Marconi Medical Systems, Inc. · 2001 · recalledK982060 · Volumax CT Imaging System · Elscint, Inc. · 1998K961464 · Select/SP · Elscint, Inc. · 1996 · recalledK930090 · Helicat · Elscint, Inc. · 1993−50
  1. Root · 6 generations backK930090 HelicatElscint, Inc. · 1993
  2. 5 generations backK961464 Select/SPElscint, Inc. · 1996 · Recalled
  3. 4 generations backK982060 Volumax CT Imaging SystemElscint, Inc. · 1998
  4. 3 generations backK012009 MX8000 Idt CT SystemMarconi Medical Systems, Inc. · 2001 · Recalled
  5. 2 generations backK033326 Philips Plus Computed Tomography SystemPhilips Medical Systems, Inc. · 2003 · Recalled
  6. 1 generation backK060937 Brilliance VolumePhilips Medical Systems (Cleveland), Inc. · 2006 · Recalled
  7. This deviceK090462 Brilliance Dual Energy OptionPhilips Medical Systems (Cleveland), Inc. · 2009
  8. Descendant · cites it directly · 2 of its ownK093703 3DIShina Systems, Ltd. · 2010
  9. Descendant · 2 generations on · 1 of its ownK112530 3DI Including CscoreShina Systems, Ltd. · 2011
  10. Descendant · 3 generations on · 0 of its ownK113442 3DIShina Systems, Ltd. · 2012

Most influential descendants

Showing 3 of 3 · See all
  • K0937033DIShina Systems, Ltd. · 2010 · cites it directly2descendants
  • K1125303DI Including CscoreShina Systems, Ltd. · 2011 · 2 generations on1descendant
  • K1134423DIShina Systems, Ltd. · 2012 · 3 generations on0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−6K930090HelicatElscint, Inc.1993—
−5K961464Select/SPElscint, Inc.19963
−4K982060Volumax CT Imaging SystemElscint, Inc.1998—
−3K012009MX8000 Idt CT SystemMarconi Medical Systems, Inc.200161
−2K033326Philips Plus Computed Tomography SystemPhilips Medical Systems, Inc.2003131
−1K060937Brilliance VolumePhilips Medical Systems (Cleveland), Inc.200661
0 (this device)K090462Brilliance Dual Energy OptionPhilips Medical Systems (Cleveland), Inc.2009—
+1K0937033DIShina Systems, Ltd.2010—
+2K1125303DI Including CscoreShina Systems, Ltd.2011—
+3K1134423DIShina Systems, Ltd.2012—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
199420
199510
199710
200120
200310
200410
200610
200810

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
201010
201110
201210
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K090462, 1993–2012Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in JAK? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new JAK device

  1. #1 K230223 iCAC Devicescore 23.5 · 12 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (2)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K060937Brilliance Volume
Summary page 1
…y option is of comparable type and substantially equivalent to the legally marketed devices currently in commercial distribution, namely: the Philips Brilliance Volume - K060937 and the GE Lightspeed CT750 HD - K081105. 4. Device Description Philips Healthcare offers a Dual Energy scanning option on t…
Philips Medical Systems (Cleveland), Inc.200661
*K081105GE Lightspeed CT750 HD (Lightspeed 8.0)
Summary page 1
…ntially equivalent to the legally marketed devices currently in commercial distribution, namely: the Philips Brilliance Volume - K060937 and the GE Lightspeed CT750 HD - K081105. 4. Device Description Philips Healthcare offers a Dual Energy scanning option on the Brilliance CT Scanner. The Brilliance…
GE Healthcare20085

Also cleared against K060937: 7 other devices →

What descends from it? (3)

1 later device cites it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K0937033DIShina Systems, Ltd.20102

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 16 years and passes through 4 companies; a new generation was cleared every 3.0 years on median.
  • 10 of the 16 ancestors have a recall of any class.
  • Of its descendants, K093703 (Shina Systems, Ltd., 2010) has gone furthest, with 2 descendants of its own.
  • 7 other devices also cite its predicate K060937.

How does its category compare?

All JAK devices

JAK System, X-Ray, Tomography, Computed: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2009, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · JAK

27in 2025

2007: 142008: 262009: 152010: 72011: 162012: 282013: 172014: 302015: 302016: 252017: 292018: 242019: 282020: 302021: 202022: 302023: 272024: 262025: 272026 (partial year): 21
2007high 30 (2014) · low 7 (2010)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · JAK

141in 2025

2007: 27 days median2008: 42 days median2009: 31 days median2010: 92 days median2011: 155 days median2012: 121 days median2013: 132 days median2014: 200 days median2015: 140 days median2016: 129 days median2017: 96 days median2018: 114 days median2019: 94 days median2020: 112 days median2021: 145 days median2022: 131 days median2023: 139 days median2024: 141 days median2025: 141 days median2026 (partial year): 167 days median
2007high 200 (2014) · low 27 (2007)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · JAK

17in 2025

2007: 112008: 162009: 292010: 512011: 342012: 232013: 112014: 102015: 282016: 442017: 332018: 102019: 52020: 82021: 152022: 92023: 92024: 202025: 172026 (partial year): 23
2007high 51 (2010) · low 5 (2019)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · JAK

219in 2025

2007: 762008: 1202009: 1052010: 1192011: 2052012: 1922013: 4142014: 3082015: 4542016: 3652017: 3382018: 5432019: 2332020: 1772021: 2612022: 1992023: 3102024: 2122025: 219
2007high 543 (2018) · low 76 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code JAK, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
200714271176
2008264216120
2009153129105
201079251119
20111615534205
20122812123192
20131713211414
20143020010308
20153014028454
20162512944365
2017299633338
20182411410543
201928945233
2020301128177
20212014515261
2022301319199
2023271399310
20242614120212
20252714117219
20262116723—

What is it indicated for?

The Brilliance CT is a Computed Tomography X-Ray System intended to produce cross-sectional images of the body by computer reconstruction of x-ray transmission data taken at different angles and planes. This device may include signal analysis and display equipment, patient, and equipment supports, components and accessories. The dual energy option allows the system to acquire two CT images of the same anatomical location using two distinct tube voltages…

Read the full statement (153 words)

The Brilliance CT is a Computed Tomography X-Ray System intended to produce cross-sectional images of the body by computer reconstruction of x-ray transmission data taken at different angles and planes. This device may include signal analysis and display equipment, patient, and equipment supports, components and accessories.

The dual energy option allows the system to acquire two CT images of the same anatomical location using two distinct tube voltages and/or tube currents during two tube rotations. The x-ray dose will be the sum of the doses of each tube rotation at its respective tube voltage and current. Information regarding the material composition of various organs, tissues, and contrast materials may be gained from the differences in x-ray attenuation between these distinct energies. This information may also be used to reconstruct images at multiple energies within the available spectrum, and to reconstruct basis images that allow the visualization and analysis of anatomical and pathological materials.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K090462: Brilliance Dual Energy Option.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 5, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K090462

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026